Days of rest and Sabbath: Israel has explicitly granted collective rights to one group of citizens and denied them to another. They came to Israel over the last years "escaping Putinism and the dangers of deteriorating democracy" and are vocally unhappy with Israeli democracy.
The Arabic language has a special status in the state; Regulating the use of Arabic in state institutions or by them will be set in law.
The Sabbath and the festivals of Israel are the established days of rest in the state; Non-Jews have a right to maintain days of rest on their Sabbaths and festivals; Details of this issue will be determined by law. What is this all about? It mainly focuses on symbolic issues.
It seems rather obvious: The Zionist Mandate for Palestine During the First World War, Great Britain came to militarily occupy Palestine and promised the Arabs their independence in exchange for a commitment to join in the war effort against the Ottoman Empire.
Considering that it usually takes a week for the president to appoint a candidate to form a government and up to six weeks to form one, the election would have to be held no earlier than around Passover to accomplish that goal.
In fact, segregation is so deep and entrenched, even maternity wards in Israeli hospitals separate between mothers, based on their race. In a recent Jewish Chronicle article, Jonathan Freedland fulminates: The US representative rightly pointed out that the only way to implement the plan was through force and that the UN had no authority to forcibly partition Palestine against the will of the majority of its inhabitants.
Thanks for having me, Sharmini.
Unlike the Basic Law, however, the Declaration of Independence is not a legal document. So in order to respond to these accusations of apartheid, the answer the Israeli Knesset and the answer of the Israeli government is yes, we are apartheid.
Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Reference to the Jewish identity of the state, however are ample and dominantwith the clear exclusion of the Palestinian people from their rights in their historic homeland: The minority recommendation of the UNSCOP report, by contrast, joined with the Arabs in favoring the democratic solution, proposing that the independence of Palestine be recognized, the same as had happened with every other Mandated territory, and a democratic government established respecting the rights of minorities.
So it is a coin toss as to how the justices will interpret it — though it definitely empowers conservative justices to help villages favor Jewish settlement on any borderline cases.
Currently a management consultant, in his spare time he engages in pro-Israel advocacy, especially in interfaith environments.
It only recognized Jewish nationality.
Researching the economic aspect of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, some of his research topics include the international aid to the Palestinians and to Israel, the effects of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories on the Israeli economy, and the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns against Israel.
Devastating law, enshrining that Palestinians will remain second and third-class citizens in Israel. Now, the United List proposed an alternative bill here which would have ensured equal rights for all of the citizens of Israel. Shir, in March of last year the U.
Democracy simply was not a solution for the Zionists—it was rather an obstacle to be overcome to achieve their aims. Then there is the Ben-Gurion factor. The Prime Minister Netanyahu pushed for this bill, which was originally proposed in They refer, for instance, to the Flag and Emblem Law adopted by the Knesset in But then there is a third category — those who claim that the law is terribly wrong, even utterly evil.
We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World. While the media may not be trying to defend such a blatantly racist law, the criticisms of the law fall within a very narrow spectrum and serves to propagandize the public with the false belief that Israel was established on democratic principles.
Moreover, the Arab leadership was insistent in their demand that the independence of Palestine be recognized under a constitution guaranteeing representative democracy and minority rights.
As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner. In case of abuse, Report this post. The joint Palestinian and Jewish opposition party, the United List, wrote an alternative bill last month calling for a democratic state with equal rights to all its citizens.
He dismisses the critical and even fearful discourse of liberal circles encouraged by the New Israel Fund, the ultimate enemy in the eyes of the right-wing. Among the reasons that have been given is that it had to be passed before the Knesset left for its summer recess on July 19, because early elections might be initiated immediately when the Knesset returns on October BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: The law of the nation-state; a very important mint-body.com I hope that if not in the next few hours, then in the next few days, as we have said before, we will pass this law, which is very important, to ensure the basis of our existence, which is Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.
Analysis. Does Israel need a law to define itself as the nation-state of the Jewish people? By Marcy Oster July 16, deals with obvious signs that Israel is a Jewish state, such as affirming.
Analysis Jewish Nation-state Law Makes Discrimination in Israel Constitutional. The nation-state law is another step in the direction of annexing the territories, but in reverse: The territories have annexed the state.
The outraged reaction to the nation-state law by Israel's Arab's citizens, human rights associations, and some liberal circles drew a lot of attention.
8 Previous article Analysis: The Jewish. Israel’s Jewish Nation State Law can’t be a departure from democratic principles for the simple reason that it owes its existence to rejecting democracy.
On. After 70 years with no law defining Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, pundits around the world have pondered why it was so urgent for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to pass such.Download