Since not all portrayals of violence are bad, the government would have insurmountable difficulty defining what is "good" violence and "bad" violence.
That is what it is to be a parent. And, freedom of speech does not apply at your work place i. Avoid the glamorization of weapon-carrying and the normalization of violence as an acceptable means of resolving conflict. Unfortunately, most entertainment violence is used for immediate visceral thrills without portraying any human cost and is consumed by adolescents or children without adult guidance or discussion.
If the government steps in and regulates the content of television shows or relegates certain shows to a late-night or early-morning hour, it steps over the line and becomes the Federal Babysitting Agency — replacing parents as the ultimate decisionmakers.
Government should not parent the parents. As they are not under the jurisdiction of the FCC, this regulation does not apply to cable channels. Our concern is that imposing standards for television programming would be unconstitutional and damage important values that define America: In this context, with helpful adult guidance on the real costs and consequences of violence, appropriately mature adolescent viewers can learn the danger and harm of violence by vicariously experiencing its outcomes.
Parents can and should establish house rules for TV viewing. Office counseling has been shown to be effective. Just as it is important that parents know the ingredients in food they may feed to their children, they should be fully informed about the content of the media their children may use.
Boundaries are important to you and your children. In a blues documentary where expletives fly? This means how many hours a week, where TV is to be watched, as well as what kind of programming. For example, the Courts have said that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution and cannot be banned entirely.
A recent revealed found that two thirds of parents actually favor increased governmental oversight of the media when children and teenagers are concerned.
Furthermore, there is a chemical change in the brain, similar to that which is seen in post-traumatic stress disorder; if enough violence is viewed, the brain reacts as if the person doing the viewing has actually been abused.
In addition, there are other potential dangers to violent TV viewing and one of the most disturbing is that young children become more violent themselves as teenagers, and tend to have more encounters with the law as adults.
The order and regulations defined core educational programming as those "specifically designed" to meet the educational and informative needs of children 16 years old and younger, of at least 30 minutes in length. Three recent studies directly compared the effects of interactive video games and passive television and movies media violence on aggression and violence; in all 3 cases, the new interactive-media-violence effect was larger.
There are many laws in society that limit your choices, e. We know, for instance, that children are psychologically affected by having less empathy, a characteristic we see in bullies; that they are more likely to use aggressive strategies to solve their problems rather than to search for more peaceful methods of conflict resolution; that they tend to be more reactive rather then proactive -- relying more on knee-jerk reactions to resolve frustrations; and finally, that they appear to be more fearful of social relationships which make them bite before they can be bitten.
The AAP makes the following recommendations to the entertainment industry: The most basic and user-friendly tool every parent has against unwanted media content is the ability to turn the television off, or to establish rules about where and when children may watch TV.
Television is considered both the most effective and the least expensive way to address the largest possible mass audience. Modeling is an essential part of parenting, and since we know that violence on TV negatively affects adults as well, lead your family to healthier viewing and happier living together.The children of _____ parents are better at soothing themselves when they get upset, more effective in regulating their negative affect, focus their attention better, and have fewer behavior problems than the children of emotion-dismissing parents.
Exposure to violence in media, including television, movies, music, and video games, represents a significant risk to the health of children and adolescents.
Extensive research evidence indicates that media violence can contribute to aggressive behavior, desensitization to violence, nightmares, and fear of being harmed. Pediatricians should assess their.
It is up to the parents to censor what their children watch, and up to the network and actors as to what they say on television. It would be an infringement on individual's rights if the Supreme Court were to allow the government to have such an.
Parents should view current events on television with their children so that they can explain any confusing or inappropriate material to their children. 6.
Just say "no" to offensive programming. An Analysis of the Television's Resource and the Ways it Should be Used in the Society. words. 1 page. Television Programs Should Be Regulated and Parents Should Monitor Their Children.
words. The Children's Television Act requires each U.S. broadcast television station to air programming specifically designed to serve the educational and informational needs of children. It also limits the amount of time broadcasters and cable operators can devote to advertisements during children's programs.Download